Jury Rules AQHA Violated Antitrust Laws by Barring Registration to Clones
According to the Amarillo Globe-News, the jury has just reached a verdict in the case of Abraham and Veneklasen vs. AQHA concerning the debate about the registration of cloned horses.
The jury decided that “an American Quarter Horse Association committee and top AQHA officials violated state and federal antitrust laws by conspiring to bar cloned horses from the organization’s horse registry,” however no damages were awarded to the plaintiffs involved in the case (McBride, Amarillo Globe-News, 2013)
Click here to read more.
We will be keeping a close eye on this story as the situation progresses to discover exactly what this means for AQHA members and the future of cloned horses within this particular breed association.
UPDATE:
Shortly following the announcement of the verdict, AQHA provided the following statement to the public via their official website.
A 10-person jury in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division, ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in the Abraham & Veneklasen Joint Venture et al v. American Quarter Horse Association lawsuit. The plaintiffs sued AQHA alleging that AQHA Rule REG106.1, which prohibits the registration of cloned horses and their offspring in AQHA’s breed registry, violates federal and state anti-trust laws. The jury awarded no damages. The trial began July 17.
“We are deeply disappointed by the outcome of this trial,” said AQHA Executive Vice President Don Treadway, Jr. “It continues to be our position that our rule prohibiting the registration of clones and their offspring is both reasonable and lawful.”
The lawsuit was filed in April 2012; Rule REG106.1 has been on AQHA’s books since 2004 although clones and their offspring have never been eligible for registration with AQHA.
“When individuals with shared interests, goals and values come together to form a voluntary association to serve a common purpose, the members have a right to determine the rules for their association. The wisdom of our membership – which is largely not in favor of the registration of clones and their offspring – has not been upheld by this verdict,” Treadway said.
“We will meet with our legal counsel and executive committee regarding our appeal options in continuing to fight for our members’ rights and announce our decision in that regard in the near future” said AQHA President Johne Dobbs.
AQHA News and information is a service of the American Quarter Horse Association. For more news and information, follow @AQHAnews on Twitter, watch the AQHA Newscast and visit www.aqha.com/news.
What’s your opinion about the verdict? Vote in our new EC poll in the bottom right hand corner of the EquineChronicle.com homepage.
Click on the link below to view the plaintiffs’ first amended complaint document.
Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Doc. for Abraham & Veneklasen Joint Venture v. AQHA
